A landmark case is a court case that is studied because it has historical and legal significance the most significant cases are those that have had a lasting effect on the application of a certain law, often concerning your individual rights and liberties. Top opinion white, j, opinion of the court justice white delivered the opinion of the court we granted certiorari in this case to examine the appropriateness of the exclusionary rule as a remedy for searches carried out in violation of the fourth amendment by public school authorities. Student suicides and school system liability new jersey v tlo, 469 us 325, 350 (1985) (powell, j, concur- the case likely will go to trial duty a legal.
New jersey v t l o supreme court of the united states 469 us 325 january 15, 1985, decided justice white delivered the opinion of the court we granted certiorari in this case to examine the appropriateness of the exclusionary rule as a remedy for searches carried out in violation of the fourth amendment by public school authorities. A case in which the court held that a new jersey public school principal has the right to search a student's purse without a warrant so long as the search is reasonable under the circumstances oyez about. New jersey v tlo is an important case because it establishes the right of school officials to search students based on reasonable suspicion, not probable cause although the case also recognizes the student's right to privacy, the court balanced that right against the school's need to provide a safe learning environment.
In my st law class i have an assignment to write a dissenting opinion on the supreme courts decision of the case of nj v tlo part of the assingment is to find three supreme court fourth amendment decisions that are related to nj v tlo. New jersey v tlo the fourth amendment to the constitution protects united states citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures our forefathers recognized the harm and abuses that occurred in the colonies to innocent people by the british, and they made sure to write protections into the us constitution. Being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued a rule of law finding liability in these v city of paterson, new jersey. New jersey v t l o, 469 us 325 (1985) argued march 28, 1984 reargued october 2, 1984 decided january 15, 1985 justice white delivered the opinion of the court.
The cases are christie et al v national collegiate athletic association et al, case number 16-476, and new jersey thoroughbred horsemen's association inc v national collegiate athletic. Being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued safford unified school district #1 et al v out in new jersey v t l. Significance of supreme court cases this was also the case in which the famous crying out fire in a crowded movie theatre example was used new jersey v tlo. The new jersey court relied on supreme court of the united states precedent to hold that whenever an official search violates constitutional rights, the evidence may not be used in a criminal case.
New jersey v tlo established a reasonable suspicion rule for school searches tlo caught smoking in the bathroom, searched her purse without a warrant and found lots of sensitive material, claimed illegal search and evidence should be suppressed. New jersey v tlo search the supreme court of new jersey overruled the appellate division access hundreds of law school topic videos, thousands of case. In conclusion, the court ruled in favor of tlo with a 6-3 vote in 1985 the majority opinion, delivered by justice white, stated that the school's search was reasonable and decided that in a school setting no warrant or probable cause is necessary because privacy expectations are lower when at school. Primary sources-new jersey v tlo npag sirs government reporterweb 13 dec 201 - this was an important source because it showed the differences between reasonable suspicion and probable cause.
Join our forum and ask a legal question for free, or to participate in discussions our forum includes lawyers, employment, insurance, tax and real estate professionals, law enforcement officers, and many other people with specialized knowledge, in addition to participation by interested laypersons. This could be about the chief justice, the justice who wrote the majority opinion, or the justice who wrote the dissenting opinion 5)include two pictures in the newsletter examples could include pictures of the supreme court building, pictures of the justices, or pictures of people or places relevant to the case. Ginsburg rides again but i also agree with justice stevens that our opinion in new jersey v tlo 'clearly established' the law governing this case she concludes, wilson's treatment of. In new jersey v tlo , a 1985 fourth amendment case dealing with reasonable searches and seizures, the us supreme court said students have a legitimate expectation of privacy when at public schools.
Justice white was assigned to write the majority opinion, and 83-712 - new jersey v tlo 83-712 new jersey v tlo. In its decision in this case, the new jersey supreme court addressed three distinct questions: (1) what is the proper standard for judging the reasonableness of a school official's search of a student's purse (2) on the facts of this case, did the school official violate that standard and (3) whether the exclusionary rule bars the use in a. The background of united states v nixon: united states v nixon was a landmark decision offered by the united states supreme court the case revolved around the watergate scandal, which began during the 1972 presidential campaign—a race between democratic senator george mcgovern and incumbent richard nixon.